Thursday, 2 February 2012

NU-Life Cosmetics Launches New Affiliate Program

NU-Life Cosmetics products and proprietary marketing system are positioned to compete head to head with the biggest manufacturers of Anti-Aging products.
LOS ANGELES, Jan. 31, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- California based DAGS LLC today launched a new home based business opportunity at http://nulifecosmetics.biz .
To compete with established home based business opportunity companies like Mary Kay, Avon, and Amway, NU-Life Cosmetics kicks off with three amazing anti-aging products, and a comprehensive marketing system that helps new affiliates/business owners to start earning money from home quickly. NUlifecosmetics.biz focuses on attraction marketing so that new affiliates are not required to rely on family and friends to be successful.
"We have created this business opportunity because there are so many people out of work that are having a very hard time finding employment. This is a step by step program that anyone can follow to make money online regardless of background or experience," said NU-Life Marketing Director Vanessa Wilson.
The cosmetics/anti-aging industry is very competitive; Ms. Wilson is confident that http://nulifecosmetics.com will serve a niche. It may have been easier to simply promote one of the existing companies' products, but Ms. Wilson recognized flaws in the systems of the established companies. It takes too long to launch a home based business with these companies; with NU-Life new affiliates can start promoting the products and be in position to earn money within minutes after registering.
NU-Life Cosmetics' products include an anti-aging wrinkle cream, a cellulite cream that works, and an anti-aging serum. NU-Life has combined products that work with a marketing plan that works to help affiliates generate income.
NU-Life's primary focus is to help affiliates be successful. "If you are looking for a way to make some extra income from home, then the NU-Life Cosmetics Affiliate Program is for you. If you want a system that actually works then you should go to http://nulifecosmetics.biz and become an affiliate," said Wilson.
About NU-Life Cosmetics:NU-Life Cosmetics manufactures and distributes anti-aging products. The company is devoted to helping people look their best while providing an opportunity to also make money from home online. NU-Life provides affiliates with a proprietary marketing system that is designed to help them make money promoting the products online and offline. To learn more about NU-Life cosmetics go to http://nulifecosmetics.com
SOURCE NU-Life Cosmetics
Buzz This

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

Home prices decline for third consecutive month

By
Home prices in the nation’s biggest cities fell for the third consecutive month in November, a sign the housing market ended 2011 in a weakened state.
The closely followed Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index showed price declines in 19 of the 20 cities it tracks in November – the second month in a row that nearly every city in the index was in negative territory. The index fell 1.3% month-over-month and was down 3.7% from November 2010.
Home prices often fall during the winter months as more purchases are done in the spring and summer months. But the three consecutive downward drops mean prices are likely to continue to keep falling in 2012.
“Despite continued low interest rates and better real GDP growth in the fourth quarter, home prices continue to fall,” David M. Blitzer, chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Indices, said in a statement.
Atlanta continued to show the most pain, posting a new index low. That city was down 2.5% over the month, after dropping 5% in October, 5.9% in September and 2.4% in August. Las Vegas, Seattle and Tampa, Fla., all reached new lows in November.
In Los Angeles, prices were down 1% in November after falling 1.5% the month before. Year over year, L.A. prices are down 5.4.%.
Given the continued malaise in the housing bust, the Obama administration has taken new measures to try and right the housing market as it enters its fifth year of decline. Last week it announced the expansion of its signature foreclosure relief program, a new refinancing plan and a new investigative unit that will further probe the mortgage-related abuses that caused the collapse in housing.
Buzz This

Florida's housing crisis: 'There's not a politician out there willing to help'

By in Miami
Years after the housing bubble burst, residents in the Sunshine State continue to face the heartbreak of home foreclosure
A foreclosure sign in front of a home in Florida. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
At the county court in downtown Miami, a stooped, elderly man smartly dressed in a light suit jacket, stands in front of the judge's bench as he tries to cancel the imminent sale of his house.
"I spoke to the bank, they gave me papers" he said.
"You'll have to file notice and notice on the day is not enough," the judge replies. "I wish there was some way I could help, I'm sorry."
Asked later what will happen, the man shrugs. "I've lost the apartment. Which I gave $85,000 in cash for."
A woman, dressed in a tight-fitting skirt suit and heels, her make-up carefully applied, approaches the bench and talks to the judge in Spanish. Within minutes, her request for an extension has been denied. She turns around and walks briskly out of the courtroom, her eyes filling with tears.
Miami-Dade courthouse's Foreclosure Master Calendar is where homeowners caught in the middle of Florida's housing crisis go to request emergency motions to cancel the bank's foreclosure sales of their homes. Some have attorneys, some represent themselves. Those with attorneys tend to fare better.
Florida enjoyed a massive housing boom before the crash, and is now one of the worst-hit by the foreclosure crisis. Out of the 4.5 million borrowers with outstanding mortgage loans, more than 2 million are "underwater", meaning they owe more than the value of their homes.
"People have no safety net. They get ill, a spouse dies, they lose their jobs and they have no support. All of these things can lead to foreclosure," said Carolina Lombardi, a senior lawyer with Legal Service of Greater Miami, a quasi-government service which represents low income families for free.
"We are seeing all kinds of people," she told the Guardian. "Middle earners who are now on food stamps. The housing bubble is a great equaliser."
David Chandler Hicks, of Alliance Legal Group, which operates all over the state, has many clients who are 65 or older but who have been forced to come out of retirement because "they are about to go broke."
"It's the good, hard-working folk that have been caught up in this mess, trying to settle down, trying to make a living, trying to buy what they were told was safe," he said. "It's part of the American dream to be a home owner. Now your biggest investment is worth half of what you paid for it. It ends in chaos. There's nobody helping these people. Nobody in federal government, or state government. There's a lot of anger and a lot of frustration."
President Obama set up the Home Affordable Refinance Program two years ago that was supposed to help homeowners with little or no equity refinance, but homeowners facing foreclosure here say it has had little effect.
They say that instead, they are facing a myriad of fraudulent and unfair practices by banks eager to force through foreclosures.
Hicks is angry that the attorney general of Florida is not seeking action in the courts against the banks. In December, the attorney general of Massachusetts, Martha Coakley, announced she was suing five of the largest banks in the mortgage business against "unlawful and deceptive conduct".
Other attorney generals, who began investigating lenders practices following admissions made by so-called robosigners, could follow suit.
"They are the only attorney generals who are sticking up for their citizens," he said.
The Republican candidates touring the state for the primary have referred, often in their attack ads, to families losing their homes here. But there is little faith among those affected that they or any other politician will make a difference.

Support groups for the foreclosed

In downtown West Palm Beach, an hour an a half drive up the coast from Miami, a group of Floridians are gathered outside the Old City Hall. They've brought fold-away chairs and blankets for their dogs, well prepared for the two hour lecture on the complex subject of foreclosure that is about to begin.
"I like to say my name's Lynn and I'm in foreclosure," Lynn Szymoniac tells her audience, to laughter. A mother of three, she tells them how she used up a lot of money for health care because she had cancer. Her elderly mother, who had Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, moved in to her home, further compounding her financial burden. Before long, she fell behind on her mortgage and found herself facing foreclosure on her home.
Szymoniac, an expert in white collar fraud and government expert witness, is something of a hero among victims of foreclosure and those fighting it, for her battle to expose a series of crooked practices by lenders and associated companies. Her lecture meanders through various types of fraud, including "robosigning", the practice of mass signings of false affidavits and other legal documents that was exposed in 2010. But, according to Szymoniac and the Florida attorneys who have, like surgeons in a war zone, become super-specialised in their field, it is still causing problems.
According to Szymoniac and fellow crusader Lisa Epstein, who runs foreclosurehamlet.org, a significant proportion of seized homes here are "manufactured foreclosures", brought about as a result of illegal and unexplained fees, misapplication of holding payments or because people have been wrongly informed.
One such charge is "forced place insurance" something which is levied by companies when a homeowner doesn't have their own insurance. Benjamin M Lawsky, the superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services investigating institutions that underwrite and sell force-placed insurance, described it as the "dirty little secret of the mortgage industry."
Because of the hurricanes in Florida, such insurance is prohibitive and can raise the cost of a mortgage by as much as $2,500 to $5,000 a year.
Around 28% of American homes are "underwater" according to RealtyTrac websites. But in Florida, where property prices skyrocketed before taking a massive dive in the crash, 48% are.
In Palm Beach County, the figure is 45%.
Szymoniac said she gets hundreds of calls and emails every week from people who have no where else to turn.
"So much of the economic disasters people fall into have to do with our broken healthcare system" she said. Others are victims of the economic recession, which cut their incomes, and the bursting of the housing bubble.
'Mommy, can we ever go back?'
Monica Zapata, a mother of two from Wellington, Florida, is among Szymoniac's audience. A travel agent whose husband had his own business in electronic components, Zapata lost her home to the bank in 2010 but is suffering still.
"It caused me a lot of stress, anxiety and panic attacks," she told the Guardian. "When we had the papers for foreclosure in April, I was rushed to the emergency room four times. I thought I was having a heart attack, I really thought: this is the big one. I'm not the person I was. My children are affected. My little boy, who is nine, says 'Mommy can we ever go back to my house?' That brings tears."
Zapata went to her bank, GMAC Mortgage, to ask them, unsuccessfully, for help. Then they went to Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (NACA), which helps victims of the subprime mortgage scandal, and got help. She said: "To cut a long story short, GMAC told us that the paperwork came too late, we can't save the house. We tried everything possible and they did not want to help us."
For homeowners who fall behind in their mortgage payment, their only hope is that the mortgage company offers a modification programme.
But such programmes are rare.
"There's not a politician out there right now who is willing to help," Hicks, of Alliance Legal Group, said. "I haven't heard any Republican candidate say anything of any note about this state or this crisis. It's far too complex for politicians, to say let's go after them would be political suicide. But the banks are guilty on every front."
Gary Thomas, 50, a father of three from Palm Springs who works in construction and remodelling interiors, took out an adjustable rate mortgage in 2004, but when the rates from Deutsche Bank went up to 9%, he said he asked "nice and politely for a fixed rate so we wouldn't end up bankrupt".
In 2009, he started missing some payments. He was able to get modified loan, but only for 9 months. On Thanksgiving, they gave him a summary judgment, which means they want to go to court for foreclosure. Thomas said that the process has taken its toll.
"Insomnia, pressure on the marriage, intermittent fights and there's the doomsday scenario. The kids have grown up in that home – we've had it for 20 years," he said. "The banks get all this money. They were bailed out. But they are not even close to helping us out."
Buzz This

Blame The U.S. For The Housing Bubble, Not China

In his New York Times Magazine column, Adam Davidson cited David Boaz of the Cato Institute as an economist who believes that easy money from China exacerbated the housing bubble in the U.S. In fact, Boaz places the blame much closer to home. His clarification is below.
Adam Davidson's citation of me as someone who believes "that all that easy money from China helped make the housing bubble much bigger and last longer, which created a far bigger crisis when the bubble finally burst" took me by surprise. It would be fine without that little prepositional phrase "from China." Easy money, yes. Housing bubble, yes. Pain when bubbles burst, absolutely. But is China to blame? I'd be inclined to point the finger closer to home.
This was a crisis caused by regulation, subsidization, and cheap money. Christopher Hitchens had a point when he wrote, "There are many causes of the subprime and derivative horror show that has destroyed our trust in the idea of credit, but one way of defining it would be to say that everybody was promised everything, and almost everybody fell for the populist bait."
  There was substantial agreement in Washington for years that home ownership was a good thing and that more home ownership would be even better. Thus Congress and regulators encouraged Fannie, Freddie, and mortgage lenders to extend credit to under-qualified borrowers. To generate more mortgage lending to low and moderate income people, the federal government loosened down-payment standards, pressured lenders to increase their percentages of "affordable" loans, and implicitly guaranteed Fannie and Freddie's dramatic expansion.
All that hard work paid off: The share of mortgages classified as non-prime soared, and the quality of those loans declined. Fannie and Freddie's debt was implicitly backed by the U.S. Treasury – despite many warnings — and they were able to expand their debt and engage in risky transactions. As Lawrence Summers wrote, "Little wonder with gains privatized and losses socialized that the enterprises have gambled their way into financial catastrophe."
Federal Reserve credit expansion, especially in 2001 – 2005, helped to make all this lending possible. "Everybody was promised everything" - cheap money, easy lending, and rising home prices. All that money and all those buyers pushed housing prices up sharply. But all good things - at least all good things based on unsustainable policies - must come to an end. When housing prices started to fall, many borrowers ran into trouble. Financial companies threatened to fall like dominos, and an ever-expanding series of bailouts began issuing from the Treasury department.
But what about China? China was eager to buy our debt, both Treasury bonds and Fannie and Freddie's debt. But it was Congress that ran the deficits, and the Fed that kept interest rates artificially low. We don't need to go to Beijing to find the villains in this piece.
So should we get tough on China? Adam Davidson has a point when he says that, "candidates always talk tough. Presidents opt for a gentle, nudging approach. They know that China, alone, gets to decide." I'd put it a little differently. Presidents usually realize that a trade war between the world's two largest economies is a very bad idea. China's currency is probably artificially low. But economists disagree on just how low. And if we don't know what it "ought" to be, how can we know what to do in response?
The real point of economic activity is not to create jobs but to add value, to create wealth and prosperity and a higher standard of living. Judged by that standard, we should probably be thanking China. If China is keeping its currency artificially low, it is hurting people who hold Chinese currency and subsidizing those of us who buy Chinese products. As the economist Mark J. Perry writes, "In the best of all possible worlds for the United States, China would use its labor and capital to manufacture consumer products like clothing, footwear, furniture, electronics, and appliances and send $300 billion worth of these products to U.S. consumers for free every year as a gift or a form of foreign aid to the American people. In addition, the Chinese would produce and send to America another $100 billion worth of raw materials, parts, industrial supplies, inputs, and natural resources at no charge, as a gift to American manufacturers every year."
They don't do that, of course. But if they're selling us products at a discount, American consumers are benefiting.
Our economy could use plenty of reforms – lower, flatter, simpler taxes; a more stable monetary policy or even a move toward free markets in money; reduced regulatory burdens; the de-monopolization of services from education to mail delivery; and less government spending. In all those cases, the problem and the solution are right here in the USA.
Source http://www.npr.org
Buzz This

Sponsored by Rapid Solicitors Leeds United v Birmingham City: Grayson calls on home fans to give off positivity

By Richard Sutcliffe
SIMON Grayson has appealed to Leeds United fans to crank up the Elland Road atmosphere tonight after admitting negative vibes from the terraces are in danger of affecting his players.
The Championship side host Birmingham City looking to make it a hat-trick of wins at home after edging past Burnley and Ipswich Town earlier in the month.
With a point having been taken off Crystal Palace at Selhurst Park in between the two victories, it means another win tonight would leave Leeds on an identical number of points to the corresponding stage last season and handily-placed to push on in the promotion race.
Grayson believes this should represent grounds for optimism but appreciates much has changed over the past year with an air of mutiny being detectable at United’s last home game against Ipswich due to the impending sale of captain Jonny Howson to Norwich City.
Much of the 3-1 victory was played out to the background of ‘Bates out’ chants, while there was also a protest by the Billy Bremner statue involving several hundred fans ahead of kick-off.
Grayson’s fear is that a similar response tonight could hamper Leeds’s hopes of beating Birmingham.
He said: “I would like the fans to be as positive as possible. Over the last few weeks, it has been something of a flat atmosphere. I understand the frustrations of the supporters but we are all chasing the same target – promotion. We can do that by being positive and vibrant.
“Right from the off, we need the roar of the Elland Road crowd as it gives the players a belief. I know it is down to the players as well to give the fans a boost.
“But we do need to work closely together. If we win the game against Birmingham, we are in exactly the same position in terms of points as we were last season.
“That isn’t a bad situation, considering the criticism that has come our way over the past few months. Last year, I know the mood was very different. Everyone was positive and really enjoying the Championship. There wasn’t the expectancy level. I knew that would rise this year.
“But there have also been other things that the crowd have taken into consideration. That is their opinion.”
Asked if the flat atmosphere is in danger of affecting his players, Grayson replied: “I think it is, yes. I can sense nervousness.
“In my career, I played in games where I wasn’t as confident as I should have been and took the easy option, hitting a hopeful ball as a safety option instead of getting on the ball and attempting a 20-yard pass.”
Grayson has no fresh injury worries as they look to avenge their 1-0 defeat at St Andrews in October, meaning changes to the starting XI could be at a premium despite the unconvincing manner of United’s display when beating Ipswich 10 days ago.
Robbie Rogers, who has signed an 18-month contract after leaving Columbus Crew, is available after receiving international clearance but will not feature tonight due to having flown back to America last week for four days until his visa came through.
Ahead of the transfer window closing at 11pm, Grayson is targeting further signings with reports north of the Border suggesting Celtic full-back Mark Wilson could be joining on loan until the end of the season.
United are also believed to have other transfer targets in mind, though Grayson admits the scheduling of a full round of Championship fixtures during the final few hours of the window is far from ideal.
He said: “From my perspective, my efforts have to be on preparing the team to face Birmingham.
“I have left a lot of the stuff in the hands of Shaun (Harvey, chief executive), Gwyn (Williams, technical director) and the chairman for them to try and conclude. The football side is the most important thing.
“But it is a strange decision (to play on January 31) because it more or less means that Tuesday can be ruled out to a certain degree.”
Grayson has brought in loanees Andros Townsend and Fabian Delph this month, made Danny Pugh’s switch from Stoke City permanent in a £500,000 deal and signed Rogers.
Overall, however, the window has been a quiet affair in not only the Football League but also, compared to last year when almost £300m was spent, the Premier League.
Grayson said: “Not a lot of business has been done. I don’t think there is a lot of money around right now in society as a whole and that is a factor why it has been so quiet. If you can’t buy players then you have to try and swap players.
“It is a window where people pay over the odds, that is something to be careful about. Norwich paid over the odds for Jonny Howson, when you consider the time he had left on his contract – hence why we accepted the deal.”
Last six games: Leeds United LLWLDW, Birmingham City DWWWWW.
Last time: Leeds United 3 Birmingham City 2; September 23, 2006; Championship.
Referee: M Dean (Wirral).
Buzz This

What are the police for?

The Home Secretary's speech on the police on Monday was billed as a coherent ideological vision for the service in England and Wales. 
As she rubber-stamped proposed changes which will take tens of millions out of officers' pay packets, Theresa May emphasised that, while "some police officers will be disappointed by this outcome", she was not forcing through reform just to save money.
She explained how changes to officers' pay and conditions, cuts to police budgets and the introduction of elected police commissioners all form part of a plan to make the force more responsive to the demands of the citizens they serve.
The past decade has seen a shift in police priorities from an enforcement approach which targets those who break the law to a consensual style which encourages people to obey the law. The service has become a bit more Dixon of Dock Green and a bit less The Sweeney.
For some, this is a worrying trend. As one delegate at the Tory conference last year put it, there should be more emphasis put on "rat catchers" rather than "social workers".
However, having spent a week with police officers of all kinds in Thames Valley, it seems to me that there is a paradox in terms of what the public want the service to do.
On a general level, people will often say they want police to catch villains and lock them up. But when you ask what they want the police to do locally, it tends to be more mundane tasks.
As the Chief Constable of Thames Valley, Sara Thornton, told me: "When we do our surveys very, very rarely do people say what's bothering us around here is burglary or robbery or car crime. What's really bothering them is anti-social behaviour, minor damage, noisiness, rowdiness, people parking inconsiderately."
In the old coaching town of Stony Stratford near Milton Keynes, for example, I met the chair of the local neighbourhood action group, Denise Branning. Top of local people's concerns were litter and thoughtless parking, she said.
Another common grievance was dog poo. Just around the corner I met a police community support officer whose duties included patrolling parks and footpaths to ensure owners picked up and disposed of the offending items.
Is this what police budgets should be spent on? In Monday's speech, the home secretary put it like this: "From the graffiti and litter that blights a local area, to the binge drinking and drug dealing that makes people frightened to step outside, right up to the criminal gangs who flaunt their illegal wealth and cheat the exchequer out of millions - our police reforms will help fight them all."
That is a much broader description of the police's role than cutting crime "no more and no less". Indeed, it might be argued, Theresa May wants them to do it all - from kids tagging a lamp-post to organised criminal gangs.
So what do you think the role of the police should be? Take part in the debate on Twitter, using the hashtag #whatarepolicefor.
Mark's series What Are The Police For starts on BBC Radio 4 on Monday 30 January at 20:00 GMT, or catch up with iPlayer
I have met police advisors who think officers should do less investigating crime and more preventing crime. Ministers insist there is a lot of bureaucracy and duplication which can be reduced.
On becoming Home Secretary, Theresa May told senior officers she wanted to be crystal clear that the mission of the service was "to cut crime, no more and no less". While the first part of that statement is unarguable, the second would seem to relegate great chunks of what the police currently do into "extras".
The lost child, the confused old gentleman who has forgotten how to get home, the burst water main that has flooded the High Street, the death notice to be delivered to relatives of a teenager killed in a road accident, the road safety advice for primary school children, the neighbours who need to be told to turn the music down: are we really saying that the police should stop doing these duties unless they are demonstrated to "cut crime"?
In episode one, the policing minister Nick Herbert accepts that there is rather more to the job than cutting crime, but insists the home secretary was right to emphasise that that is the core of their mission.
The reforms, she said, "will leave us with a police force that is answerable to the public and transformed in its ability to fight crime".
In effect, the Home Secretary was offering her answer to a question upon which I have been pondering for the past couple of months: what are the police for?
My new BBC Radio 4 series, for which that question acts as the title, begins on Monday. At first glance, we think we know the answer: it is about fighting crime and keeping people safe. But a cocktail of major reform and budget cuts obliges politicians and police chiefs to be a bit more precise than that.
Some chief constables are warning that neighbourhood policing may have to be cut. Others say they need to look at the amount of time spent on partnership working and the meetings with other agencies.
I have met police advisors who think officers should do less investigating crime and more preventing crime. Ministers insist there is a lot of bureaucracy and duplication which can be reduced.
On becoming Home Secretary, Theresa May told senior officers she wanted to be crystal clear that the mission of the service was "to cut crime, no more and no less". While the first part of that statement is unarguable, the second would seem to relegate great chunks of what the police currently do into "extras".
The lost child, the confused old gentleman who has forgotten how to get home, the burst water main that has flooded the High Street, the death notice to be delivered to relatives of a teenager killed in a road accident, the road safety advice for primary school children, the neighbours who need to be told to turn the music down: are we really saying that the police should stop doing these duties unless they are demonstrated to "cut crime"?
In episode one, the policing minister Nick Herbert accepts that there is rather more to the job than cutting crime, but insists the home secretary was right to emphasise that that is the core of their mission.
The past decade has seen a shift in police priorities from an enforcement approach which targets those who break the law to a consensual style which encourages people to obey the law. The service has become a bit more Dixon of Dock Green and a bit less The Sweeney.
For some, this is a worrying trend. As one delegate at the Tory conference last year put it, there should be more emphasis put on "rat catchers" rather than "social workers".
However, having spent a week with police officers of all kinds in Thames Valley, it seems to me that there is a paradox in terms of what the public want the service to do.
On a general level, people will often say they want police to catch villains and lock them up. But when you ask what they want the police to do locally, it tends to be more mundane tasks.
As the Chief Constable of Thames Valley, Sara Thornton, told me: "When we do our surveys very, very rarely do people say what's bothering us around here is burglary or robbery or car crime. What's really bothering them is anti-social behaviour, minor damage, noisiness, rowdiness, people parking inconsiderately."
In the old coaching town of Stony Stratford near Milton Keynes, for example, I met the chair of the local neighbourhood action group, Denise Branning. Top of local people's concerns were litter and thoughtless parking, she said.
Another common grievance was dog poo. Just around the corner I met a police community support officer whose duties included patrolling parks and footpaths to ensure owners picked up and disposed of the offending items.
Is this what police budgets should be spent on? In Monday's speech, the home secretary put it like this: "From the graffiti and litter that blights a local area, to the binge drinking and drug dealing that makes people frightened to step outside, right up to the criminal gangs who flaunt their illegal wealth and cheat the exchequer out of millions - our police reforms will help fight them all."
That is a much broader description of the police's role than cutting crime "no more and no less". Indeed, it might be argued, Theresa May wants them to do it all - from kids tagging a lamp-post to organised criminal gangs.
So what do you think the role of the police should be? Take part in the debate on Twitter, using the hashtag #whatarepolicefor.
Mark's series What Are The Police For starts on BBC Radio 4 on Monday 30 January at 20:00 GMT, or catch up with iPlayer
Buzz This

Area's school foundations make a big difference

As outlined in Sunday’s Daily Home, local school foundations are making up for lost state funding by providing the extras that are so often critical to the success of our children.
From Sylacauga’s $100,000 grant for technology last year to Pell City’s funding of a trip to Europe to Talladega’s musical education grants, the foundations are stepping in to help local school systems caught between reduced revenue at the state and local level.
Tough economic times make it tough on the foundations as well.
First, raising the money is more difficult.
Most foundations work from a base amount of money contributed by donors. That money is then invested, and the investment income is used to fund programs approved by the foundation’s board.
“The days of a $25,000 chair from (someone) down the street are not there anymore, so that’s something we are evaluating right now,” said Laura Strickland, who leads the Sylacauga Schools Foundation.
Without those larger gifts, foundations sometimes find themselves participating in fundraisers to build the principal balance available for investment.
And, as is the case across the country, the investment return is not as great as it was a few years ago, meaning the foundations face a double hit — not as much money to invest and a smaller return on their investments.
Jason Goodgame, who is president of the Pell City School Foundation, says his group has changed the way it awards grants to deal with the reality of less money to give away.
They have gone from awarding $18,000 to $20,000 in grants each year to awarding $12,000 to $13,000, in Pell City.
Talladega, which usually awards $9,000 to $10,000 in grants each year, sometimes goes outside the classroom, providing money for needed items in the band program or in the athletic program.
The success stories are plentiful. There is no doubt that students all across our area benefit from school foundations, set up to provide much-needed money for our schools.
“I’ve served on a lot of boards, but this is the only thing I’ve stuck with, because there is such a need to help,” said Goodgame.
To him, and Stewart and Scott Munroe of the Talladega Foundation, we say thanks for the good work you do.
We hope to see more and more donations coming into the foundations, as concerned citizens sticking together can make a real difference in the educational opportunities afforded our students.
Buzz This